

F E D E R A L N E W S
This Page Last Updated on 2/8/25​
​
March for Life 2025 speakers inspire:
‘We have the truth on our side’
By Nancy Flanders | January 24, 2025 , 07:09 pm
The 52nd annual March for Life in Washington, D.C. took place on Friday, January 24, 2025. The event featured multiple speakers.
Click Here for the full article, including links to 10 of the speeches given at the rally before the March.
​
Biden Falsely Declares
Failed Equal Rights Amendment as ‘law of the land’
January 17, 2025
​
CV NEWS FEED // Outgoing President Joe Biden on Friday baselessly declared that the controversial and unratified Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) has become the “law of the land.”
Pro-life critics, including the U.S. Bishops, have decried the ERA, which mandates “equality of rights” between the sexes as a means to advance a pro-abortion agenda.
​
The Constitutional amendment passed in both houses of Congress in the early 1970s but failed to be ratified by a sufficient number of state legislatures by its 1982 deadline. Abortion activists have routinely pressed for its illegal advancement ever since.
​Read full article Here​
​
Senate Will Vote on Pro-Life Bill
to Protect Babies Who Survive Abortions
from an article published January 10, 2025
The Senate will hold a vote this month on important legislation to protect babies who survive abortions.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune is planning a procedural vote this month on the Born Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act. CLICK HERE to read the full article.
Justice Alito Confirms Federal Law Requires Hospitals to “Protect an Unborn Child From Harm” Liberty Counsel | Jun 27, 2024 | Washington, DC Read Full Article HERE
​
SUPREME COURT DECISION ANNOUNCED 6-13-24 REGARDING FEDERAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION'S METHOD OF DISTRIBUTING ABORTION PILLS
The US Supreme Court announced its decision June 13, 2024 that leaves women at higher risk and causes the death of preborn babies. Justice Kavanaugh's comments about the group of pro-life physicians who filed the suit are included in his statement in an article published by by Reuters: "Under Article III of the Constitution, a plaintiff's desire to make a drug less available for others does not establish standing to sue," Kavanaugh wrote, referring to the constitutional provision laying out the authority of the U.S. government's judicial branch.
Pro-life groups nationwide are grieving this decision by SCOTUS. Read the full Reuters article HERE
​
Steven Ertfelt from LifeNews.com published a pro-life article on 6-13-24 about the Supreme Court's decision. that gives an excellent explanation on the background of the law suit, and the reason behind the decision by SCOTUS. Ertfelt's comments call to mind the late Paul Harvey, a radio commentator who acquired a reputation for reporting on "The Rest of the Story." Ertfelt's pro-life article can be read in full Here. We hope you will review Ertfelt's article. Also - The full syllabus for this court case (previewed in Ertfelt's article above) is available online. Click HERE for access to this 38-page public document showing the full description of the case.
​
Supreme Court Ruling Leaves Idaho Abortion Ban in Place to Protect Unborn Babies
Steven Ertelt | Jun 27, 2024 | 10:58AM | Washington, DC
​
The nation’s highest court issued a ruling in a case today where the Biden administration wanted to force Idaho to expand abortions. Instead, the Supreme Court ruled that the case needs more time at the lower court level before it can weigh in on the merits.
As a result, the Idaho abortion ban is still in place and
Today, the U.S. Supreme Court sent Moyle v. United States and Idaho v. United States back to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to hear oral arguments on the case.
The opinion is what is known as a DIG, which is “dismissed as improvidently granted.” The High Court is not taking either side but saying that the case should have been allowed to proceed further below before the Supreme Court decided to address the issue.
Liberty Counsel Founder and Chairman Mat Staver said, “This order means that the case returns to the Ninth Circuit, which had ordered that the appeal of the preliminary injunction be decided by the full court on an expedited basis without any further briefing. The abortion ban currently remains in place in Idaho, except for those in emergency room situations.”
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court admitted to mistakenly publishing a document online concerning a pending abortion case. Bloomberg Law obtained the document before it was promptly taken down from the website.
According to Supreme Court spokeswoman Patricia McCabe, the document was “inadvertently and briefly uploaded” to the court’s website. McCabe clarified that the ruling itself “has not been released.”
It remains unclear whether the document was a draft decision, the final decision, or something else entirely. Either way, Bloomberg said it appeared the Supreme Court is going to side with Biden officials in their attempt to force Idaho to allow abortions above and beyond that it’s law allows.
There is more -- Read the remainder of the article CLICK HERE
​
50 Pro-Life Groups Call for Investigation of Five Babies Killed in Infanticides or Abortions
Steven Ertelt | Apr 9, 2024 | 10:17AM | Washington, DC
Two years ago, pro-life advocates made a horrific discovery when they opened boxes of medical waste from a late-term abortion facility in Washington, D.C.
​
Inside were the bodies of 115 aborted babies, including five who appeared to be nearly full term and possibly victims of illegal partial-birth abortions or infanticide. CLICK HERE to read full article.
​
​
From a 2023 Article -- Study:
60% of Women Who Had an Abortion
Did Not Really Want It
​An excerpt from this Aleteia article reads, "When women with a history of abortion were asked if abortion was consistent with their values or preferences, 70% said it was not."
Click HERE to read about a new peer-reviewed study by the Charlotte Lozier Institute. The studied 1000 Women aged 41-45 Who Have Had an Abortion. Are you surprised by the findings?​